Rise of Christianity in Rome

Christianity is the world’s largest religion, with over 2.4 billion adherents, about a third of the world’s population. It contains so many religious followers such as Baptist,Protestant, Catholicism, Jehovah Witness and so many more. With that, how did the idea of Christianity first started? Religion played a key role in the daily life and social system of Ancient Rome. Both Christianity and Rome influenced Europe in a number of ways. Religion incorporated the love of numerous divine beings and more divine beings were frequently embraced from vanquished territories. Since most religions were polytheistic at the time, the Romans seldom denied a clique from a vanquished area to proceed. A couple of religions kept running into discussion and resistance from natives or government, for example, the clique of Deus Sol Invictus, and that of Isis. Romans were additionally not excited about monotheistic religion which clarifies their partition from the Jews. Be that as it may, over every single other religion, the Romans couldn’t help contradicting, aggrieved and were compromised most by Christianity. The acquaintance of Christianity with the Roman Empire tested a key firm component of Roman custom and culture – religion – and eventually added to the Empire ‘s breaking down.

Christianity previously showed up in the Western scopes of the domain, in the territory of Judea. In spite of the fact that its beginnings were in a remote periphery area, the belief system started, spread and developed to be a considerable foundation under Roman standard. There is by all accounts little report of the first debate with Jesus Christ himself, anyway there is documentation of later reports of the spread of Christianity. By the second century Christianity asserted just about 50,000 adherents (as can be evaluated). Anyway the Romans knew little of the development (1). One of the principal documentations we have originates from Pliny, when he is Governor of an area in cutting edge Turkey (2); It is correspondence among him and Emperor Trajan, asking for guidance for the issue of this new Christian religion which has been an unsettling influence to local people “They [the Christians] additionally proclaimed that the whole of their blame or mistake added up to close to this; they had met routinely before first light on a settled day to recite sections on the other hand among themselves out of appreciation for Christ as though to a divine being, and furthermore to tie themselves by vow… After this service it has been their custom to scatter and reassemble later to take nourishment of a conventional, safe kind; yet they had in truth surrendered this training since my decree, issued on your directions which prohibited all hetaeras (political clubs)”3.

The Emperor at that point reacted expressing that in the event that the Christians conceded their religion and, would make one forfeit or concede the presence of the Roman divine beings they were to be liberated with no further mistreatment, nonetheless on the off chance that they were difficult and won’t, they were rebuffed (4).

Right now Pliny trusted Christianity to be a superstition, and Greek thinkers censured Jesus just like a magician. It is difficult to discern whether their observations were the standard, as when the Christians started developing and having control over the vast majority of the world, they devastated much data censuring them (5).

Christianity spread quickly and went to the core of the realm: Rome itself. Many say that Christianity spread so quick because that it was a religion for poor men and slaves. Christianity offered an individual association with God, as opposed to being intervened by ministers It likewise offered salvation, sharing that life on earth was not as essential as what sat tight for people who had been of good heart6. There likewise was the viewpoint that it was inviting to ladies, permitting them more authority rights as ministers. Christianity offered direction and salvation uninhibitedly spoke to unmindful and powerless frequently poor (7). It succeeded in light of the fact that religions neglected to meet individual good and profound needs (8). Truly it was not simply poor people; Christianity engaged any individual who needed their capacities perceived regardless of how well off they were (9). Roman character did not generally permit this and you should procure your way up though Christianity evened out all. This was agitating to Romans.

In spite of the fact that Christianity may have been seen as a lower class religion, its absolutely impossible it would have developed to such numbers or such power without the gentry (10). It is known obviously that respectable Romans were Christian. Indeed, even before Constantine there more likely than not been a couple of Christian nobles in the Roman realm, however they were close-lipped regarding it. There probably been a reason this religion spread to the honorable classes, yet sadly there has not been an inside and out investigation about this to date. With this spread Romans became very suspicious about the Christian cult. In fact in 35AD, the Senate decreed it a “strange and unlawful (11). They did not like the idea of monotheism, believing to favor one God so highly above others would anger them. The idea of polytheism also supported the Roman Empire, as by worshipping the gods an individual in turn worshipped the emperor in a way and believed the signs of priests and words to the emperors to be directly from the Gods (12). Christians also refused to pledge allegiance to the emperor believing their allegiance could only be sworn to God and Jesus (13). Theophilus of Antioch described it as such “The emperor, given authority by God, must be honored with a proper respect, but he must not be adored. You see, he is not God; he is a man whom God has placed in that office not to be adored, but in order that he exercise justice on earth… As the emperor may not tolerate that his title be taken over by those subject to him, so no one may be adored, save God”14. Romans also found the idea that Christians did not make sacrifices to be very disturbing, especially when combined with the fact that they would gather to “drink the blood and body of Christ” 15. Sacrifice was the norm throughout polytheism and the fact that Christians refused sacrifice of any kind, to any god or even for luck, disturbed many citizens. The Christians saw it as because if they sacrificed it would be worshipping a false idol. Christianity wanted “celibacy, frugality, self-restraint, and time for prayer and reflection.” These were very non-Roman things. Christianity had to convince dying a virgin was a triumph where Romans believed a woman who died childless and unmarried a tragedy. Romans looked for prosperity, generosity and simplicity, where Christianity at the time looked to isolation and often self-harm (16).

A look into Roman life will show that the connection between their gods and their government was very close. They measured the two side by side which explains why they took so much offense at the Christians refusal to worship and sacrifice This idea was one of the main ways Christianity influenced the fall of the empire, but this will be discussed later.. Romans found the Christians to be suspicious and were often worried they were plotting against the empire (17). This was because their meetings were often and secretive, somewhat more of a political gathering than a cult. Pliny describes them as hetaeras, meaning a political group, for the reason that Christians were more like communities, they gathered together, helped one another out, and did daily activities together, creating a greater sense of belonging (18). In Roman religions just because individuals may not have similar interests in gods, they would not congregate and act so closely as a subculture.

What the Romans could not fathom and what seemed to anger them the most was the idea of a loving God (19). The concept that a God loved everyone even those who might not worship him to the fullest, and that he was forgiving was way beyond the Romans. The Roman way of life accepted that gods could be angered and that to keep them happy offerings must be made, but their gods still did not love every individual in the way Christians described. Demands and returns were not new ideas but love for a god and love with moral goodness to one’s neighbors was completely revolutionary (20). With a little psychology it could be noted that the Romans, were so were used to passionate and angry gods, as well as constant violence between war and games, felt somewhat confused and threatened by the idea of a calm and loving God.

The Romans reacted with wariness of the Christian cult and with almost constant persecution. Though of course interactions with the Christians varied emperor to emperor, it was most often persecution, and blame for anything wrong in the empire. Surprisingly this constant persecution did not hinder the religious cult, but rather it returned stronger time and again.

Some may wonder why there was this violent reaction to Christians yet the Jewish cult remained quiet. This is because early in the empire, laws had been set which hindered Jews from spreading their religion and gave them set areas in which to worship (21). In this way they never out right offended nor got in the way of polytheistic religions. Jews also tended to be less stubborn understanding to keep up respect to the emperor. Judaism was an exclusive religion which was not open for just anyone and became difficult to join (22).

As Christianity began to grow, changing the way the Empire functioned, it began to threaten the structure of the entire empire, in turn presaging its demise. The final push was Constantine’s succession as emperor and his Edict of Milan. After this Christians were allowed to worship freely, and became the obviously favored cult. Before this point, religion was what held the people and the emperor together. They worshipped their gods for personal reasons but also because it contributed to the bettering of the empire. When the emperor in a way stated this did not matter as much, and in a way told them their gods were a lie, the complete structure of Roman life fell apart.

Constantine was the first push that allowed to Church to change into the power we know today. Constantine allowed the political and material support that the church needed. Constantine, though not directly, influenced his successors to persecute other cults (23). Constantine gave many legal positions, such as governing areas and managing grain supplies to Christian clergy or members, further increasing their power. Some have said that Constantine was a sign to the commencing of the Kingdom of God (24).

The post-Constantine Christian Church was blamed by citizens of the empire for diverting funds to support the church rather than citizens, and for inflicting harm on Jews and infidels as well as for attacking sexual guilt (25). It is true that beginning with Constantine a partnership was made between the head of the church and the state treasury so they were able to take funds when “needed”26. Constantine becomes key benefactor and allows the head Bishop (Caecilian) to take large sums of money from finance minister in order to pay for any expenses of the clergy. It was said that a priest was not allowed to participate in trade, nor the lending of funds. Clergy were to live as the aristocracy, not getting caught up in the life of a merchant; rather they would let business come to them (27). Clergy were also exempt from taxes (28). Exempting Clergy from taxes was a bad idea, as it would cause a lot of the empire’s money to go into funding the Church rather than holding the empire together or expand. The exemption caused an unbalance in the empire as way to many people jumped to join clergy for financial reasons. The emphasis on sexual guilt broke down much of the empire’s identity as the Romans were a very sexual people, their humor always included sex, there was a large prostitution population; it is not hard to tell through factual art history that the Romans were surrounded by sex. By denouncing this and making them all feel bad about it, it ruined a key element in their life.

Not all downfall of the empire came from Constantine; it was also his successors that furthered the push for Christianity. As Edward Gibbons states in the Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, it was under Theodosius I that Christianity gained its most power, and shut down remaining pagan cults. Theodosius I in 391 made it illegal for sacrifice or visits to temples, saying it offended human law. Also those who did not worship Christianity “correctly” for example, worshiped Easter on the wrong day, were harshly punished. With Theodosius so began church as an institution, “bishops chosen for political contacts, emperors interfering in theology and church government, and massive administration loads for church leaders” 29. At the beginning Church leaders hoped the empire and church would combine, becoming a Christian empire, but soon realized followers were spread outside the land and it was too difficult to hold together such a large area based solely on ideology (30).

Further ways that Christianity broke down Roman identity and by doing so, the empire was through the contrast of religious society. As previously mentioned, the Romans society was tightly knit with their religion. Roman religion was ordered b loyalty, military and social status, reflecting the actual society31. It held together the social order by saying just “the gods made it so” . It was so entwined that any religious holidays actually became civil celebrations, with everyone coming together (that is, other than the Christians) 32. In fact over time the term piety began to mean not simply loyalty, but respect for the city’s customs, and obedience for the city33. The city of Rome became a religious icon; this can be further backed up in art where the city gets portrayed as a woman beside victory. The Romans were proud of their religion and believed it set them apart from all others (no mention of the Greeks.) Because of this, once Christianity took over, there was no longer that strong pride behind the city, and there was no more worshipping of the city. This was a blow to the Roman collective identity, and it strongly influenced the breakup of an entire empirical identity. Constantine and his family were so strongly attached to Christianity, and the citizens of Rome were so greatly attached to their emperor that when Constantine made the switch of religions, Rome and what it meant to be Roman, changed. During the early Christian emperors, paganism was still allowed, but it was not as strong after this introduction and acknowledgement of a monotheistic religion. Under Constantius there was a stronger desire to combine Church and State fully. Constantius believed by centralizing the government they would have a stranger imperial administration (34). Citizens who would not listen to the Emperor would listen to the Church, those who did not listen to the Church would listen to the Emperor.

There have been arguments that Christianity broke down the Empire to create a more impressive State. This is used by Cicero’s definition of state which is a gathering of people brought together by a consent of laws and community of interests (35). Before Christianity there were so many different cultures and provinces that they only came together under the idea of Rome as a city and their Roman society. Once Christianity came into play, Rome was broken down and the glue that held this large empire together fell apart. However as time went on Christianity being a community of interests and a consent of laws that agreed with the Bible’s teachings, became a better state (36).

To Continue with the Sample Please Select an Option below

I need this example

I need only this particular public sample without academic success tools

well, maybe!

I need a custom essay

I want an original plagiarism-free paper written by a skilled professional writer

I’ll do it on my own

I want to come up with the topic, research samples and write my own top-notch paper

wow, sure!