Comparison of Federalism and Absolutism

Federalism is a type of government that divides control between central government and states government. Federalism enables states to be autonomous in their own policy making, while also coordinated inside the government framework. Federalism is a standout amongst the most essential and inventive ideas in the United States Constitution, despite the fact that the word never shows up there. In America, the states existed first, and they attempted to make a national government. Confederacy had been attempted by the thirteen states under the Articles of Confederation, and was found to be lacking, in that it didn’t give sufficient cohesiveness between the individual country states.

The Articles of Confederation established a government but, restrain the powers of the central government. This was a crucial flaw in the articles, the central government had no power of taxation, no trade powers, and it accommodated a similarly powerless executive.

Therefore it could not enforce legislation or make states honor national obligations. Federalism is a direct parallel of the U.S constitution. Federalism is the sharing of power between national and state government this is clearly stated in the constitution with the checks, and balances between the three branches of government; executive, judicial, legislative and the congressional branches. Absolute monarchs ruled through absolutism or “absolute power”. Absolutism pronounced that the king ruled through divine reason with a legitimate claim to power and uncontested authority. Louis XIV of France and Suleiman I of the Ottoman Empire, on this premise, were both absolute monarchs. Each ruler believed that all the power belonged to him and him alone because divine right. They demonstrated their supreme power by living luxuriously, expanded their power by taking up arms, and kept power by ensuring the complete loyalty of their subjects.

Monarchs, by commissioning buildings and monuments, displayed their power over the world/empire. Louis and Suleiman were no exemptions. Louis had one of the greatest palaces on the planet built amidst a marsh. This demonstrated his total power on the grounds that no builder truly wanted to build a royal palace in such a place. His father’s hunting lodge be left in place and the new palace be worked around it. It took forty thousand specialists and many years before the completion of Versailles. Notwithstanding, Louis was as of yet not totally satisfied with the palace. Throughout the years, he kept on adding numerous luxurious rooms and additions to Versailles. Suleiman, likewise had many elaborate building ventures commissioned amid his reign. These included mosques, palaces, and bridges. One of Suleiman’s most noteworthy building ventures, sparing no expense was the Suleymaniye Mosque.

Since the mosque was being built in his own honor, Suleiman did not even give his chief architect, Sinan, a financial plan for the undertaking. Within the mosque was canvassed in blue tile to flaunt the abundance of wealth of the sultan. Absolute monarchs did not only use architecture to show off their power, they used many laws and powers to make sure everyone knew they were in charge. Because of the way Absolute monarchs ruled is a major deciding factor on why the Revolution started in the first place.

Did you like this example?

257

14