Behavior of a Simple Nexorade or Reciprocal Frame System

Among the group of space structures is a typology called nexorades or reciprocal frame structures. Nexorades can have different designs and shapes. This article centers around a basic setup to get results that are easy to peruse and convey. The point is to improve comprehension of the structural behavior of nexorades to simplify their design. Two investigative techniques are proposed to compute the bending resistance and the stiffness of a nexorade. The impact of the connections between members on the structural behavior and the robustness is examined.

An assessment is made with flat grids.

A nexorade can be classified as statically determinate or indeterminate. In this manner, it will carry on distinctively under load cases and will robustness or not. To get a statically determinate structure, it is important that there are the same number of limitations as there are kinematic unknowns. Along these lines, the equilibrium of the structure prompts a scientific system that has the same number of conditions as unknown, since each imperative in the structure links two degrees of freedom, in this way conveys one condition to the system. In a nexorade, each nexor is related to 6 kinematic unknowns for a rigid body motion. Those statically determinate structures give no repetition, henceforth no robustness: if there is a failure anyplace in the structure, it will result in a general collapse. They are additionally non-sensitive to settlements and thermal loads. There are no internal forces: the structure moves freely. It additionally implies that if a nexor is created with a huge dimensional resilience (for instance longer than the others, which is the same as applying a positive thermal load), it won’t result in an absence of fit: the structure will alter its shape so that the nexor fits. regarding with robustness, the designer of a nexorade may not want it to be statically determinate. For instance, the connection system of the nexorade constructed in Bibracte (Andreu, Vaudeville, & Aubry,2010) just has two released rotations (along the major axis at each end), and has all of the 6 translations constrained (3 at each end). It continues carrying on like a nexorade as long as the major axis rotations at the two ends are released (else it would draw nearer to a flat grid). The additional limitations in the structure are contradicting its disfigurement, making other internal forces like axial torque or bending moment along the minor axis. Those internal forces will help convey the applied load and add stiffness to the structure. They add redundancy to the structure. In any case, if the nexors are intended to be considerably stiffer in bending about the strong axis, the impact of the extra limitations can be irrelevant for a uniform downward load. On account of failure of a component or a connection in a statically determinate structure, the structure turns into an unstable mechanism. Conversely, a statically indeterminate nexorade might have the capacity to give alternative load path to convey the load, for instance through axial torque or minor axis bending. The more limitations the structure has, the more robust it tends to be. The stiffness related to the alternative load paths can be picked with the goal that the internal force caused by settlements, thermal enlargement or dimensional resistance are low. This is one of the great benefits of nexorades. On the off chance that we oblige axial torque and bending moment along the minor axis in a nexorade, we make two groups of alternative load paths. In the two cases, it is a second order stability, which implies that vast deflection will happen before achieving stability. These two mechanisms are contending with each other. One mechanism will sway the other if the stiffness of the components and connections related to this mechanism is more prominent. Obviously, there is no compelling reason to contain all the degrees of freedom related with a mechanism to get a second order stability: just a single extra constrain can make up for a coincidentally expelled one. A connection between two nexors is expelled to mimic its failure.

Second order stability through minor axis bending and axial constrain. After a failure, axial force happens in the structure to keep the nexor that has a broken connection to fall out. This device is like a catenary structure. Its thrust is balance by bending moment along minor axis, Axial force and bending moment along the minor axis is an alternative method to convey the applied load until the perimeter supports to get a second order stability. Second order stability through minor axial torque. After a failure, axial torque happens. It battles against differential rotation between nexors. This system keeps the nexor that has a broken connection from rotating excessively.

Looking at nexorades and flat grids. It ought to be noticed that a flat grid is an extraordinary sort of nexorade, in which rotation along the strong axis are compelled at both ends of the nexors. The shear stress in a nexorade is more noteworthy in the center, in opposition to that of a flat grid which is more prominent on the border. The flat grid has high bending moment and reaction at the inward corner. Despite what might be expected having a non-rectangular perimeter doesn’t influence the nexorade much. Regardless it has equally spread reactions and bending moments. Nexorades can’t contend with flat grid as far as bending moment and deflection. In any case, nexorades are considerably less compelled than the grid option. It empowers them to all the more likely suit irregular perimeters and deformation loads, for example, settlements, local or global thermal loads and dimensional resistances. Besides, nexorades can accomplish robustness.

Two investigative strategies are proposed to break down the contemplated setup of nexorade. The first proposes a systematic formula to figure the maximum bending moment for a uniform load. The second one depicts two matrices that characterize the structural behavior of the nexorade and demonstrates an approach to figure them. Those techniques are helpful pre-dimensioning devices. At that point, an approach on the degrees of freedom compelled at the connections between nexors is proposed. It is demonstrated that a nexorade can be statically determinate or indeterminate. A well designed nexorade will have robustness without being over-compelled. Along these lines, it will exploit its low sensitivity to settlements, local or global thermal loads, dimensional resilience and irregular parameters and will give adequate robustness. This is the reason nexorades are a commendable solution because of some particular project prerequisites, regardless of whether they are less productive than flat grids to the extent resistance and stiffness are concerned. Further work should be directed to comprehend the impact of more complex geometries and load cases on the structural behavior depicted in this paper.

Did you like this example?

954

50